MARRIAGE \ Divorce \
Print this page
In the Name of Allaah, All Compassionate, All Merciful
Click here to return to home page

 

Ruling concerning divorcing a menstruating woman and its legal effect

Question: A mother of two children was divorced by her husband but at the time of the divorce she was not in a state of purity. However, she did not tell her husband that until the time that they went to the judge. She hid that information from him but not from her mother. The mother told her not to tell the judge for, if she did, the judge would not pronounce the divorce. Afterwards, she stayed with her family and then she wanted to be reunited with her husband out of fear that her children would grow up lost and un-cared for [since their father would not be present]. What is the ruling concerning that divorce that took place while she was menstruating?

Response: Divorce that takes place while the woman is menstruating is disputed among the scholars. Indeed, the discussion over it is quite lengthy. The question is whether it was a divorce that took place or a divorce with no meaning to it whatsoever.

The majority of the scholars say that it is a divorce that takes place and has legal effect. That is, it is considered a divorce but, at the same time, the person is ordered to take her back and to not touch her until she becomes pure from the menses and then gets her menses a second time. Then when she becomes pure after that second period, he may either keep her or he may divorce her. This is the approach of the majority of the scholars, including the four Imaams, Imaams Ahmad, ash-Shaafi'ee, Maalik and Abu Haneefah. However, the strongest opinion, we feel, is the conclusion of Shaykh al-Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah. This is that the divorce said during the menses does not take place and has no legal effect. This is because it goes against what Allaah and His Messenger (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa sallam) have ordered. The Prophet (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa sallam) has stated:

((Whoever does a deed that is not in accord with our affair shall have it rejected)).

The evidence for the particular case of the menstruating woman is the hadeeth of 'Abdullaah ibn 'Umar. He had divorced his wife when she was menstruating. The Prophet (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa sallam) was informed of that and he became angry. He said:

((Order him to return to her and then leave her until she becomes pure and then has her menses again and then becomes pure again. At that time, he may keep her or he may divorce her)).

The Prophet (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa sallam) said:

((That is the period during which Allaah has ordered the women to be divorced)).

So the period in which Allaah has ordered women to be divorced is for her to be divorced while she is pure and not having had sexual intercourse with her husband. If he divorces her while she is menstruating, he did not divorce her according to the command of Allaah. Therefore, the act is rejected. The divorce that occurred to the woman in this question, in our opinion, is a divorce that did not exist. The woman is still under the marriage contract of her husband. It is regardless of whether he knew that he divorced her while she was pure or not pure. His knowledge is not taken into consideration. However, if he knew that she was menstruating, he would be sinful and the divorce would not take effect. If he was unaware of that fact, the divorce would not have taken effect but there would be no sin upon the husband.

Shaykh Ibn 'Uthaymeen
Fataawa al-Mar.ah